Thursday, February 12, 2009

NO WAY!

Say it isn't so. Democrats complained about Bush and how we wanted "openess." Now the President is pre-selecting questions? How dare he. If this is true, let's drop-kick his sorry behind out in 4 years. This is a hippicrate at it's finest. I hate being lied to and deceived. At least be honest with the people.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123431418276770899.html

Obama's Press List
Membership shall have its privileges.
FEBRUARY 11, 2009

About half-way through President Obama's press conference Monday night, he had an unscripted question of his own. "All, Chuck Todd," the President said, referring to NBC's White House correspondent. "Where's Chuck?" He had the same strange question about Fox News's Major Garrett: "Where's Major?"

The problem wasn't the lighting in the East Room. The President was running down a list of reporters preselected to ask questions. The White House had decided in advance who would be allowed to question the President and who was left out.

Presidents are free to conduct press conferences however they like, but the decision to preselect questioners is an odd one, especially for a White House famously pledged to openness.

We doubt that President Bush, who was notorious for being parsimonious with follow-ups, would have gotten away with prescreening his interlocutors. Mr. Obama can more than handle his own, so our guess is that this is an attempt to discipline reporters who aren't White House favorites.

Hillary in Dependency

It doesn't look good for Hillary. Was it a bad decision to give in so easily? This is her reward for unity?



http://thehill.com/dick-morris/hillarys-incredible-shrinking-role-2009-02-09.html


Hillary’s incredible, shrinking role
By Dick Morris 02/09/09 06:23 PM [ET]


Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is finding that her job description is dissolving under her feet, leaving her with only a vestige of the power she must have thought she acquired when she signed on to be President Obama’s chief Cabinet officer.


Since her designation:
out foreign policy as his turf. His visit to Afghanistan, right before the Inauguration, could not but send a signal to Hillary that he would conduct foreign policy in the new administration, leaving Hillary in the role of backup.



• Richard Holbrooke, the former Balkan negotiator and U.N. ambassador, has been named special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan. He insisted on direct access to the president, a privilege he was denied during much of the Clinton years.
• Former Sen. George Mitchell (D-Maine), negotiator of the Irish Peace Accords, was appointed to be the administration’s point man on Arab-Israeli negotiations.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Fairness Doctrine: Did a Liberal Say That?

I cannot believe I hear a liberal Democrat railing against the Fairness Doctrine and actually make sense.


http://www.salon.com/opinion/paglia/2009/02/11/stimulus/

A rocky first few weeks
By Camille Paglia

Speaking of talk radio (which I listen to constantly), I remain incredulous that any Democrat who professes liberal values would give a moment's thought to supporting a return of the Fairness Doctrine to muzzle conservative shows. (My latest manifesto on this subject appeared in my last column.)

The failure of liberals to master the vibrant medium of talk radio remains puzzling. To reach the radio audience (whether the topic is sports, politics or car repair), a host must have populist instincts and use the robust common voice. Too many Democrats have become arrogant elitists, speaking down in snide, condescending tones toward tradition-minded middle Americans whom they stereotype as rubes and buffoons. But the bottom line is that government surveillance of the ideological content of talk radio is a shocking first step toward totalitarianism.

Someone's Predicting Failure Already?

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9ebea1b8-f794-11dd-81f7-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1

Why Obama’s new Tarp will fail to rescue the banks
By Martin Wolf: February 10 2009 18:06

Has Barack Obama’s presidency already failed?

In normal times, this would be a ludicrous question. But these are not normal times. They are times of great danger.

Today, the new US administration can disown responsibility for its inheritance; tomorrow, it will own it. Today, it can offer solutions; tomorrow it will have become the problem. Today, it is in control of events; tomorrow, events will take control of it. Doing too little is now far riskier than doing too much. If he fails to act decisively, the president risks being overwhelmed, like his predecessor. The costs to the US and the world of another failed presidency do not bear contemplating.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Thank You Democrats

The bailout plan is a bust and everyone knows it. It is a feel-good program that will not amount to anything but greater debt in the long run. Thanks alot Obama. Your plan is crashing us.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/29119665

Stocks Tumble as Bailout Plan Is Unveiled

US stocks fell sharply Tuesday in a broad-based decline as the government announced details of its latest bailout plan.
The
Dow Jones Industrial Average was down nearly 300 points after Treasury Secretary Tim Geither revealed details of the bank-bailout plan. Earlier, the blue-chip index was down less than 100 points.

Monday, February 9, 2009

Old School

Who doesn't remember a teacher, or nun, giving a good beatdown when you were a kid. In almost every case, I remember the kid deserving of it. Maybe that is why we all turned into pansy democrats. Teachers hurt our feelings as well as our bottoms.

Get a grip kids! If you act properly and your parents were actually "parents," maybe there would not be these situations.

http://cbs2chicago.com/investigations/Painful.Lessons.Abuse.2.931134.html

'Painful Lessons': Abuse At Chicago Schools
Hundreds Of Kids Beaten, Whipped, Even Choked By Teachers, Coaches


Hundreds of students have allegedly been beaten by teachers, coaches and staff at Chicago Public Schools. 2 Investigator Dave Savini continues his ongoing investigation involving the illegal use corporal punishment.

Treveon Martin, 10, is afraid of a teacher at his school. "I've seen him hit five of them in the classroom," Martin said. Martin says he and others have been hit, grabbed and even struck with a belt. "He's threatened almost all the kids in his classroom," Martin said. He says it happened at Robert Emmet Academy in November but a Chicago Public School investigator didn't talk to him until last week - 70 days after the case was reported, and not until after we started asking questions.

Friday, February 6, 2009

Biden Gives Odds

Biden is very sure of the Democratic agenda isn't he?

http://www.cq.com/flatfiles/editorialFiles/temporaryItems/biden_gives_odds_on.html?docid=3026783

Biden Gives Odds on Messing Up
By Edward Epstein, CQ Staff CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWSFeb. 6, 2009 12:15 p.m.

Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. is nothing if not optimistic. So it was a little surprising when he hedged a bit earlier today, telling House Democrats there is "30 percent chance we'll get it wrong."
He was referring to efforts by the new administration and the Congress to address what he called a "constellation of crises" at home and abroad that pose great risks for the nation.
"If we do everything right, if we do it with absolute certainty, there's still a 30 percent chance we'll get it wrong," he told the lawmakers at their policy retreat in Williamsburg, Va.


Biden, who stopped at the meeting on his way to an international security conference in Munich, said "not since World War II, at least, has a caucus gathered with so much at stake for our country, with the stakes so high." He listed the economic crisis and ongoing fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan as the most pressing issues.

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Another Broken Promise

Hippocrate on the rise



Obama's promise of ethics reform faces early test
By Peter Baker Published: February 3, 2009 http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/02/03/america/03lobby.php

WASHINGTON: During almost two years on the campaign trail, Barack Obama vowed to slay the demons of Washington, bar lobbyists from his administration and usher in what he would later call in his Inaugural Address a "new era of responsibility." What he did not talk much about were the asterisks.

The exceptions that went unmentioned now include a pair of cabinet nominees who did not pay all of their taxes. Then there is the lobbyist for a military contractor who is now slated to become the No. 2 official in the Pentagon. And there are the others brought into government from the influence industry even if not formally registered as lobbyists.

"This is a big problem for Obama, especially because it was such a major, major promise," said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. "He harped on it, time after time, and he created a sense of expectation around the country. This is exactly why people are skeptical of politicians, because change we can believe in is not the same thing as business as usual."

Obama on his first day in office imposed perhaps the toughest ethics rules of any president in modern times, and since then he and his advisers have been trying to explain why they do not cover this case or that case.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Thanks for Manning Up

Tom, you did the right thing.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D964904G0&show_article=1

Daschle withdraws as nominee for HHS secretary

WASHINGTON (AP) - Tom Daschle withdrew his nomination on Tuesday to be President Barack Obama's Health and Human Services secretary, dealing potential blows to both speedy health care reform and Obama's hopes for a smoother start as president.
"Now we must move forward," Obama said in a written statement accepting "with sadness and regret" Daschle's surprise request to be removed from consideration. A day earlier, Obama had said he "absolutely" stood by Daschle in the face of problems over back taxes and potential conflicts of interest.
Daschle, the former Senate Democratic leader and a strong backer of Obama's presidential bid, said he would have been unable to operate "with the full faith of Congress and the American people."
"I am not that leader, and will not be a distraction" to Obama's agenda, he said.

Sunday, February 1, 2009

"Forgot" to Pay?

How do you fail to pay taxes when you are a democrat? This is the party of tax and spend. Yet, Daschle failed to pay his and wants you to pay yours. Let us not stand behind this loser. He is an embarrashment to the Democratic Party -- a hippocrat at best.

Daschle apologizes for failing to pay taxes
Feb 2 12:43 PM US/EasternBy KEVIN FREKINGAssociated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Trying to salvage his nomination, Tom Daschle apologized Monday for delinquent tax payments as President Barack Obama and a top Senate chairman stood by him as the choice to lead the Health and Human Services Department.

Following a weekend of revelations about taxes and potential ethical conflicts, Daschle expressed remorse to the Senate Finance Committee, the panel that will decide his fate, saying he was "deeply embarrassed and disappointed" about failing to pay more than $120,000 in back taxes.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Taking A Page From the Bush Manual

After all the whing and complaining we did about the Bush Administration's secrecy and manipulation, there is no way we would do the same. Actually invent something to scare the public into action. No way. That would make us hippocrates.

And....Democrats have never been known to add pork to the budget, have we?

http://businessandmedia.org/articles/2009/20090127165919.aspx

Senator Warns White House Will 'Create Crisis' and 'Panic' to Push Stimulus
Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., criticizes mainstream media for not reporting loads of pork in proposed legislation. By Jeff Poor Business & Media Institute1/27/2009 5:04:03 PM

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Obama's First Blunder

Everyone knows how funny and stupid it was when President Bush tugged on that locked door in China. What a buffoon we thought. It isn't so funny when our buffoon can't distinguish a door from a window, is it?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/01/28/2009-01-28_hey_bam_thats_not_the_door.html

Hey Bam, that's not the door!
By LIISA O'NEILL DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER Wednesday, January 28th 2009, 1:42 PM

It looks like President Obama hasn't gotten acquainted to his White House surroundings. On the way back to the Oval Office Tuesday, the President approached a paned window, instead of the actual door -- located a few feet to his right.Doors didn't open automatically for Obama’s predecessor either. While making a hasty exit from a 2005 press conference in Beijing, former President George W. Bush tugged on the handles of a door, only to find it locked.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

1st TV Interview

It is good to see that Obama is more concerned about other countries' opinions rather than our own. For his first TV interview, he chose.................Arabic cable TV network Al-Arabiya. That is a much better choice than ABC, isn't it?

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/01/president-ob-10.html

President Obama Does First Formal TV Interview as President with Al-Arabiya
January 26, 2009 6:29 PMHuma Khan-->

As special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell heads off to the region to begin work on negotiating a cease fire between Israel and the Palestinians, President Obama has sat for his first formal TV interview with the Arabic cable TV network Al-Arabiya, ABC News has learned.

The interview was taped this evening and is set to air at 11 pm ET, as Mitchell is in the air and on his way to the region.Based in Dubai, Al-Arabiya estimates that it has a potential audience exceeding 23 million in the Gulf region.

Monday, January 26, 2009

Kind Of Surprised at the TV Ratings

I had heard that the inaugeration was the highest viewed event of all-time. I was surprised that it was less watched than the Reagan one. What a shock.

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/20/will-obama-break-1981-ronald-reagan-record-for-inauguration-nielsen-ratings/11134

Updated: Will Obama break 1981 Reagan record for inauguration Nielsen ratings? No.
Posted on 20 January 2009 by Robert Seidman

Final Update: The Obama inauguration was watched by 37.8 million, second only to Reagan’s 41.8 million in 1981.Another update: still haven’t seen the viewer numbers but James Hibberd reminded me that a household ratings point is larger today than it was in 1981, so Reagan’s record might not be safe after all. We’ll see!Update: Reagan looks safe, but Obama appears headed for second most-watched inauguration.Ronald Reagan’s inauguration twenty-eight years ago on January 20, 1981 set the inaugural ratings record, averaging almost forty-two million (41,800,260). Will Barack Obama break the record?I was in the nearby Safeway about five minutes after the inauguration ended and it was a barren ghost town. But that’s a bit anecdotal for my tastes.We won’t likely know the results until tomorrow, but in the meanwhile here’s some real data for today, though it is based on Internet rather than television. According to the Silicon Alley Insider based on data from Akamai the early numbers for the inauguration among news web sites was that they saw 5.4 million visitors per minute.Peak total visitors per minute were 5.4 million, making it one of the top five events ever, trailing both the 2008 presidential election (#1 with 8.572 million visitors per minute at peak traffic) as well as the first day of the NCAA college basketball tournament last March (#3 with 7.01 million visitors/minute ).We’ll have to see if Obama can dethrone Reagan as the inaugural Nielsen ratings champ, but in the meanwhile you can see the inauguration numbers back to 1969 via the Nielsen Wire.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Could Gore Be Wrong

We all know that our beloved Al Gore got ripped off in the 2000 presidential election. His defeat has turned him into a Global Warming Guru. Could it be that he has turned into a flim-flam man? We already know that he doen't walk the walk. His mansion uses more electricity than the city. He took a limo 3 block at Cannes Film Festival. Now the true Guru says carbon trading is a governmental sham. But, we all knew that, except Al Gore.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126921.500-one-last-chance-to-save-mankind.html?full=true&print=true

One last chance to save mankind

James Lovelock. But the originator of the Gaia theory, which describes Earth as a self-regulating planet, has a stark view of the future of humanity. He tells Gaia Vince we have one last chance to save ourselves - and it has nothing to do with nuclear power

Your work on atmospheric chlorofluorocarbons led eventually to a global CFC ban that saved us from ozone-layer depletion. Do we have time to do a similar thing with carbon emissions to save ourselves from climate change?
Not a hope in hell. Most of the "green" stuff is verging on a gigantic scam.
Carbon trading, with its huge government subsidies, is just what finance and industry wanted. It's not going to do a damn thing about climate change, but it'll make a lot of money for a lot of people and postpone the moment of reckoning. I am not against renewable energy, but to spoil all the decent countryside in the UK with wind farms is driving me mad. It's absolutely unnecessary, and it takes 2500 square kilometres to produce a gigawatt - that's an awful lot of countryside.