Friday, May 11, 2018

How Crazy Can Maxine Get?



 

Maxine Waters explodes on House floor: I resent ‘making America great again’!

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/rep-waters-offended-by-call-for-unity-i-resent-making-america-great-again/
 
California Congresswoman Maxine Waters doesn’t want to hear any talk about making America great, especially if it’s coming from a straight white man.
 

Waters went off the rails at a recent House debate when Pennsylvania Rep. Mike Kelly had the audacity to suggest the country needed to shift focus from what divides to what unites.

Tuesday, April 24, 2018

Finland's basic income trial falls flat





Finland's basic income trial falls flat


Currently 2,000 unemployed Finns are receiving a flat monthly payment of €560 (£490; $685) as basic income.

"The eagerness of the government is evaporating. They rejected extra funding [for it]," said Olli Kangas, one of the experiment's designers.

Some see basic income as a way to get unemployed people into temporary jobs.

The argument is that, if paid universally, basic income would provide a guaranteed safety net. That would help to address insecurities associated with the "gig" economy, where workers do not have staff contracts.

Supporters say basic income would boost mobility in the labour market as people would still have an income between jobs
 
 


 

Political Correctness



Box Office Poison: 6 Reasons Amy Schumer’s ‘I Feel Pretty’ Flopped


 

From a respectable $30 million opening for Trainwreck, to a disappointing $19.5 million opening for Snatched (which ultimately flopped), to a humiliating $16 million opening for I Feel Pretty…  Amy Schumer’s movie career is now in serious trouble. If you include Thank You for Your Service (which grossed just $9.5 million), Schumer has now starred in three flops in a row.

 

Like Jennifer Lawrence, Amy Schumer has almost certainly destroyed a promising movie career — quickly devolved from movie star to box office poison.

What makes this latest opening especially catastrophic for Schumer is that, unlike the R-rated Trainwreck and Snatched, I Feel Pretty is PG-13, and therefore accessible to a much wider audience. Nevertheless, even with its relatively low budget and PG-13 rating, Deadline reports I Feel Pretty will still lose money.

How did this happen? Let me count the ways…

 

No Sex Appeal

 

In the Woke Era, we are not supposed to say these things out loud, but no matter how much the Social Justice Warriors attempt to gaslight us into believing otherwise, human nature is still human nature, and who wants to spend $12 and two hours watching a chubby woman act like a hot chick?

There is certainly room in comedy for a Lou Costello, Oliver Hardy, John Candy, and Melissa McCarthy (who is looking pretty great these days). But the chubby comedian is its own genre, one filled with pratfalls, sweetness, humiliation, pathos, and ultimately triumph over the snobs.

Schumer is not a chubby comedienne. She looked fantastic in Trainwreck. Instead, then, she is a rich celebrity who has let herself go, who doesn’t care about her looks, and who demands we accept her sloth and self-loathing as an act of empowerment. This, of course, is absurd. No one goes to the movies to look at themselves.

Had Schumer been in Trainwreck-shape and used CGI or a fat suit for the jokes (See: Hal, Shallow), I Feel Pretty would have been more appealing because Schumer would have been more appealing.

I am sorry, but that is just true. In fact, it is biology.

Let me add that this is not just about weight. Quite stupidly, all of the sex appeal was stripped from another 2018 flop, the Warner Brothers remake of Tomb Raider.

The character of Lara Croft is iconic, primarily for her otherworld beauty, her womanly sexiness, her hot cha cha. And probably because they are too provincial to understand that there are not enough woke people in the world to turn a movie into a hit, the filmmakers stupidly stripped Lara Croft of the very thing that made her an icon — her sex appeal.

Worse still, they cast Alicia Vikander, who is herself breathtaking, and still used a fascist boot to stomp dead the character’s va-va-voom.

Nearly 17 years ago, Angelina Jolie’s Lara Croft grossed $130 million domestic, compared to the remake’s $56 million, and I will guarantee you that was because Jolie padded her bra and captured our sexual imaginations, stirred something primal in us — while Vikander acted like a guy.

Jolie wanted to be objectified and we were happy to objectify her. That was her choice and ours, a fair trade in a free country.

Removing sex appeal from movies is going to come with a heavy cost.

 

Amy Schumer is a Jerk

 

After her massive hit with Trainwreck, Schumer squandered all of that goodwill by becoming a stuffy asshole, a scold, another left-wing Hollywood narcissist; a divisive, preachy, bitter, pompous, self-righteous insufferable who is going to tell us what to think, what to believe, how to speak, and who to vote for.

She lost half of her potential audience right there, maybe more.

I Feel Pretty had nothing to offer moviegoers other than Schumer. It is not an event movie or a CGI’d thrill-ride; it is an Amy Schumer movie and Mrs. Schumer is working overtime to alienate the customers.

 

Amy Schumer Walked Into the Woke-Trap

 

Schumer presents herself as “woke,” and regularly reassures the woke mob that she is one of them. What she has failed to understand is the trap she walked into, the trap that says you can never be woke enough.

Had Schumer remained the comedienne she once was — rebellious, mouthy, independent — and not sold out to the establishment, had she lifted her middle finger to the woke mob’s censorious demands for intellectual conformity and “approved” jokes, I Feel Prettymight have had a chance.

Instead, she decided to make a “woke” comedy about a chubby woman who wants to be a supermodel and learns that there is nothing wrong with being chubby.

To any normal person that already sounds plenty woke. Unfortunately for Schumer, the woke mob is never satisfied, and in order to send a lesson about the necessity of intellectual purity, they leaped on I Feel Pretty and picked it to death.

And so, Schumer lost a base that will never be satisfied and her sniveling attempts to appease the mob only turned off us normal people even more.

No One Wants to Attend a Lecture

As soon as the fame of Trainwreck hit her, Schumer became a hot mess, a neurotic, a crybaby, a preening, sanctimonious hypocrite always at the ready to lecture the “little people.” The cute girl who used to do anything for a laugh became our first wife. Who wants to spend good money and precious time attending a movie that is probably a tired lecture?

 

 

The ‘I Feel Pretty’ Trailer Sucked

 

Even if you put 1-4 aside, the I Feel Pretty trailer looked like a one-joke movie spread thinner than thin — like a relatively amusing five-minute sketch stretched to the breaking point.

Hollywood Comedies Suck

Mired in Seth Rogen-style filth, stuck in the bottomless rut of the New Production Code of stifling political correctness, the comedy genre is becoming radioactive to moviegoers.

It is not that people do not want to laugh — of course we do. The problem is that the ever-encroaching artistic fascism of the left means that only body fluids and self-humiliation remain fair game, and we are already tired of it.

Think about this…

People are so hungry to laugh they gave the return of a 30-year-old sitcom record ratings. Why? On top of loving Roseanne Barr, she promised to be different, to be inappropriate, to welcome everyone by satirizing everyone (including herself), to tell jokes that would upset and shock the uptight squares in the establishment (and God bless her, she is doing exactly that), to tell stories about people we can actually relate to…

What’s more, Roseanne Barr is not part of the Hollywood establishment, which makes her especially attractive when we no longer trust the Hollywood establishment to make us laugh.

When Amy Schumer sold out to the establishment, when she decided to be “appropriate,” she stopped being likable, funny, and, yes, attractive.

 

 





Tuesday, March 27, 2018


FLASHBACK: Bill Clinton’s Census Asked About Citizenship


 
 
The Department of Commerce announced that it would include a question about citizenship status on the 2020 U.S. Census, which sparked outrage among Democrats on Tuesday.
However, Former President Bill Clinton’s Department of Commerce asked about citizenship in their 2000 census.
Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Tom Perez said that asking a citizenship question on the census was “a craven attack on our democracy and a transparent attempt to intimidate immigrant communities.” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said the decision violated the Constitution.
However, the 2000 U.S. Census long-form questionnaire, which went out to an “average of one in six households,” included questions about citizenship.
Where was the Democrats’ outrage in 2000 over questions about citizenship?
 

 
 
 

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

More Freedom Lost; This Time The Choice for Fur


San Francisco expected to ban fur sales, stirring backlash: 'What’s next? They’re going to say that you can’t have beef?'


San Francisco could become the largest U.S. city to ban the sale of fur, a move that would hearten animal lovers but frustrate niche business owners who say they are fed up with city officials dictating what retailers can or can't sell.
 
If the Board of Supervisors approves the ban Tuesday, San Francisco would join two other California cities — West Hollywood and Berkeley — in saying no to a glamour symbol that animal advocates say is built on cruelty and does not reflect the city's values.
 
San Francisco has a strong social conscience, often at a cost to businesses. Its board has banned the sale of menthol cigarettes and other flavored tobacco, which voters will consider in June, and prohibited performances by exotic animals. In 2016, San Francisco approved what was then a groundbreaking paid parental leave law, requiring private employers to offer six weeks of fully paid leave.
 
If passed, the fur ban would go into effect Jan. 1 and apply to coats and anything else featuring real fur, including keychains and gloves.

Why CA Dems Come Off as Nuts


 

California Lt. Gov. Called ICE Chief a ‘Prick’ in an Official Email


Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) called the director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) an “a plus prick” in an official government email obtained by NTK Network.

 

Newsome was citing a story by SFGate.com that focused on ICE officials arresting illegal immigrants in California. In the email, sent to his sister, Hilary, Newsom wrote:

“No doubt in my mind they will target us – the ice director is an a plus prick this is personal / political strategy , get ready.”

Is This Democrat for Real??

D.C. lawmaker says recent snowfall caused by ‘Rothschilds controlling the climate’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-lawmaker-says-recent-snowfall-caused-byrothschilds-controlling-the-climate/2018/03/18/daeb0eae-2ae0-11e8-911f-ca7f68bff0fc_story.html?utm_term=.3a4b2a3e86ba



A D.C. lawmaker responded to a brief snowfall Friday by publishing a video in which he espoused a conspiracy theory that Jewish financiers control the weather.
 

D.C. Council member Trayon White Sr. (D-Ward 8) posted the video to his official Facebook page at 7:21 a.m. as snow flurries were hitting the nation’s capital. The video, shot through the windshield of a car driving west on Interstate 695 through downtown Washington, shows snowy skies while White narrates.
 

“Man, it just started snowing out of nowhere this morning, man. Y’all better pay attention to this climate control, man, this climate manipulation,” he says. “And D.C. keep talking about, ‘We a resilient city.’ And that’s a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful.

Monday, March 19, 2018

Dems, Really? The 2nd Amendment Support








A Democratic congressman from Long Island implied that Americans should grab weapons and oppose President Trump by force, if the commander-in-chief doesn’t follow the Constitution.

Rep. Tom Suozzi made the remark to constituents at a town hall last week, saying that folks opposed to Trump might resort to the “Second Amendment.”

“It’s really a matter of putting public pressure on the president,” Suozzi said in a newly released video of the March 12 talk in Huntington. “This is where the Second Amendment comes in, quite frankly, because you know, what if the president was to ignore the courts? What would you do? What would we do?”

A listener then blurts out, “What’s the Second Amendment?”

The left-leaning Democrat says, “The Second Amendment is the right to bear arms.”

The spectators laughed — some nervously. Republicans were not amused.
 
 
 

 

 

Saturday, March 17, 2018

Where is Freedom of Speech for All


Ohio Student Suspended for Refusing to Leave Classroom During Gun Control Walkout

A high school student in Hilliard, Ohio, didn’t want to pick sides in the contentious gun debate surrounding Wednesday’s “National Walkout,” so he stayed in class instead of joining the largely anti-gun protest or an alternative “study hall.”
Hilliard Davidson High School senior Jacob Shoemaker was then reportedly slapped with a suspension.
The student argued that divisive politics have no place in America’s schools and he refused to take sides in the debate, according to the Associated Press.

Thursday, March 15, 2018

Calfornia Lost


California Appoints Illegal Alien to State Office


http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/15/california-appoints-illegal-alien-state-office/

She complained that illegal aliens are not adequately represented in state government, and described her appointment as a step towards correcting that alleged injustice.
“While undocumented students have become more visible in our state, they remain underrepresented in places where decisions that affect them are being made,” Mateo said, as quoted by Fox News.

Tuesday, March 6, 2018


 

Maxine Waters promises reparations in ‘stump speech for 2020’

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/maxine-waters-promises-reparations-stump-speech-2020/

Later, an attendee challenged Waters to push for reparations and take up a bill John Conyers had sponsored in this House in previous sessions.








Waters said she would.
“I’d be happy to do that. That’s no problem,” she answered.
“In order to get where we need to go on this issue and other issues, we really got to understand that 2018 is important in taking back the House and taking back the Senate,” Waters said.


Tuesday, January 16, 2018

President Nobama



President Nobama


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455453/president-trump-undoes-obama-legacy-commonsense-nobama


Donald Trump continues to baffle. Never Trump Republicans still struggle to square the circle of quietly agreeing so far with most of his policies, as they loudly insist that his record is already nullified by its supposedly odious author. Or surely it soon will be discredited by the next Trumpian outrage. Or his successes belong to congressional and Cabinet members, while his failures are all his own. Rarely do they seriously reflect on what otherwise over the last year might have been the trajectory of a Clinton administration. Contrary to popular supposition, the Left loathes Trump not just for what he has done. (It is often too consumed with fury to calibrate carefully the particulars of the Trump agenda.) Rather, it despises him mostly for what he superficially represents

The wonder was never how to grow the economy at 3 percent (all presidents prior to 2009 had at one time or another done just that), but rather, contrary to “expert” economic opinion, how to discover ways to prevent that organic occurrence. Obama was the first modern president who apparently figured out how. It took the efforts of a 24/7 redistributionist agenda of tax increases, federalizing health care, massive new debt, layers of more regulation, zero-interest rates, neo-socialist regulatory appointments, expansionary eligibility for entitlements, and constant anti-free-market jawboning that created a psychological atmosphere conducive to real retrenchment, mental holding patterns, and legitimate fears over discernable success. Obama weaponized federal agencies including the IRS, DOJ, and EPA in such a manner as to worry anyone successful, prominent, and conservative enough to come under the federal radar of a vindictive Lois Lerner, Eric Holder, or a FISA court. Trump has sought to undo all that, point by point. The initial result so far is not rocket science, but rather a natural expression of what happens when millions of Americans believe they have greater freedom and safety to profit and innovate, and trust they will not be punished, materially or psychologically, for the ensuing successful results. The radical upsurge in business and consumer confidence is not revolutionary but almost natural. The Left and Never Trump Right claim that Trump is Stalin, Hitler, or Mussolini. In fact, for the first time in eight years, it is highly unlikely that the FBI, IRS, CIA, DOJ, and other alphabet-soup agencies see their tasks as going after the president’s perceived opponents. The same about-face is true on the foreign-policy front, as the ancient practice of deterrence replaced the modern therapeutic mindset. Obama blurred, deliberately so, the lines between allies and hostiles. America experienced the worst of both worlds: We were rarely respected by our friends, even more rarely feared by our enemies; loud rhetorical muscularity was backed up only by “strategic patience” and “leading from behind.”

A history of presidential potty mouths

A history of presidential potty mouths

http://thehill.com/video/in-the-news/368976-watch-a-history-of-presidential-pottymouths

What's the Matter with California?


What's the Matter with California?

https://pjmedia.com/trending/whats-matter-california/

This just in from what was once the best state in the Union:

Guess which state has the highest poverty rate in the country? Not Mississippi, New Mexico, or West Virginia, but California, where nearlyone out of five residents is poor. That’s according to the Census Bureau’s Supplemental Poverty Measure, which factors in the cost of housing, food, utilities and clothing, and which includes noncash government assistance as a form of income.

Given robust job growth and the prosperity generated by several industries, it’s worth asking why California has fallen behind, especially when the state’s per-capita GDP increased approximately twice as much as the U.S. average over the five years ending in 2016 (12.5%, compared with 6.27%).

The Left's first, last and only instinct is to throw more money at the problem, but California's already done that. and guess what?

It’s not as though California policymakers have neglected to wage war on poverty. Sacramento and local governments have spent massive amounts in the cause. Several state and municipal benefit programs overlap with one another; in some cases, individuals with incomes 200% above the poverty line receive benefits. California state and local governments spent nearly $958 billion from 1992 through 2015 on public welfare programs, including cash-assistance payments, vendor payments and “other public welfare,” according to the Census Bureau. California, with 12% of the American population, is home today to about one in three of the nation’s welfare recipients.

The generous spending, then, has not only failed to decrease poverty; it actually seems to have made it worse.

The progressives who control every aspect of the state's government are not necessarily stupid people, but they are malign. They understand that increasing welfare spending only encourages the arrival of more recipients on whom to spend it, and the high likelihood that those new constituents will vote Democrat as soon as they are able, legally or otherwise. Already, some 55 percent of "immigrants" receive means-tested benefits, while only 30 percent of native Californians do so.

Thursday, December 7, 2017

Off the Rails on the Crazy Train

As if we haven't had enough of Obama, he has decided to take a ride on the Crazy Train.  Ozzy would be proud.

 

 

OBAMA COMPARES TRUMP TO HITLER, IMPLIES AMERICA LIKE 1930S NAZI GERMANY

Former president in bizarre rant

https://www.infowars.com/obama-compares-trump-to-hitler-implies-america-like-1930s-nazi-germany/
The bizarre remarks were made during an Economic Club of Chicago event on Tuesday night but have been largely ignored by the mainstream media.
Obama addressed the “nativist mistrust and unease” that has swept the world and brought a populist backlash that helped Trump win the election, before going on to assert that the U.S. has survived tough times in the past and will do so again.
The danger is “grow(ing) complacent,” Obama said. “We have to tend to this garden of democracy or else things could fall apart quickly.”


It’s unclear whether Obama meant six million people since Adolf Hitler’s death toll reached nowhere near sixty million (although Communism, which Obama appears to not be too bothered by, claimed at least 100 million lives). He was probably referring to the death toll from the Second World War, which estimates put at between 50 to 80 million.
However, Obama’s implication that Trump represents a threat to democracy or even the lives of American citizens and that the situation in the country is akin to 1930s Nazi Germany is clearly demented.
Newsbusters highlights how despite the profoundly deranged nature of Obama’s comments, they received barely any mainstream press attention at all.
“No surprise either that Obama didn’t appear to get pushback for this comment from his personal friend and financial backer, who just happened to be his interviewer, Mellody Hobson,” writes Kristine Marsh. “Hobson is not just a financial contributor for CBS, but is a close friend and high profile donor to Obama’s two presidential campaigns.”